| |
Recent Articles
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Colorado Civil Justice League applauds a unanimous decision by the Colorado Supreme Court which will benefit both employers and employees.
The decision in Lucht's Concrete vs. Horner (Case No. 09SC627) reversed a Court of Appeals ruling that held that continued employment is not adequate consideration for a noncompetition agreement once an employee has been hired.
"We find no distinction between a decision to agree to a noncompetition agreement offered at the initial hiring period and a decision to agree" after employment has begun, wrote Justice Allison Eid.
Read more
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Vote for the Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of the Month for May!
Read more
Sunday, May 08, 2011
An op-ed column in the April 17 Pueblo Chieftain
by CCJL’s Mark Hillman apparently got under the skin of Colorado Trial
Lawyers Association vice president James M. Croshal, whose letter to the editor displayed tactics with which defendants against frivolous lawsuits are all too familiar.
After claiming that the op-ed was “inaccurate and untrue,” Croshal
engages mostly in argument and identifies only one “fact” as untrue:
Read more
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Crossgrove v. Walmart
Read more
Monday, April 11, 2011
To hear trial lawyers and their anti-business enablers tell it, the only
thing that prevents Colorado employers from literally chaining workers
to their desks is the "right to sue" their dastardly bosses. In this
fantasy world, trial lawyers never bring frivolous lawsuits and fired
employees never file dubious claims motivated but grudges against their
former employers.
In fact, listening to testimony recently on Senate Bill 72 (sponsored by
Sen. Morgan Carroll, D-Aurora, and Rep. Claire Levy, D-Boulder), the
uninitiated could be forgiven for wondering — given the obvious virtue
presumed by the bills' supporters — why the sponsors don’t propose a new
law that simply accepts employees' claims at face value, dispenses with
the inconvenience of a trial, and orders those heartless employers to
immediately deposit funds into plaintiffs' bank accounts.
Maybe that’s on their agenda for next year.
Read more
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Despite the sponsor's effort to find common ground with the bill's
critics, Democrats on the Senate Local Government Committee today sided
with trial lawyers and against doctors, families and Colorado businesses
to kill House Bill 1106 on a 3-2 party-line vote.
Presented to overturn a bizarre 4-3 decision by the Colorado Supreme
Court in November 2010, HB 1106 clarified how medical costs should be
calculated in personal injury cases. The court's majority found that
injured plaintiffs were entitled to "billed" medical costs -- even when
the billed amount greatly exceeded the amount ultimately paid. A
survey by Colorado Civil Justice League of recent cases found that
billed amounts sometimes exceeded the paid amount by two, four or, in
one case, eight times.
Read more
Sunday, March 27, 2011
After clearing the House of Representatives on a bipartisan 37-27 vote,
House Bill 1106 (sponsored by Rep. Bob Gardner, R-Colorado Springs, and
Sen. Ellen Roberts, R-Durango) is slated for a hearing in the Senate
Local Government Committee on Tuesday, March 29, at 2 p.m.
The curious committee assignment, the prerogative of Senate President
Brandon Shaffer (D-Longmont), evoked considerable speculation among
state capitol observers who debated whether the assignment amounted to a
lifeline, a death sentence or a "jump ball" in the five-member
committee which does not ordinarily consider bills pertaining to civil
law.
For Sen. Roberts, the bill sponsor, Local Government is familiar territory — a committee on which she serves. The committee is chaired by Sen. Joyce Foster (D-Denver) and also includes vice chair Sen. Jeanne Nicholson (D-Black Hawk), Sen. Irene Aguilar (D-Denver) and Sen. Bill Cadman (R-Colorado Springs).
Read more
Sunday, March 27, 2011
(Published in the Denver Business Journal)
Read more
|
|
Latest News
|
|


Fighting for common sense in the Courtroom:
|